Research Article
A study on “Variation in Phenological stages of Malt Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.) As influenced by Varying Fertility Levels and Liquid Biofertilizers under Semi-arid Region of Rajasthan, India
Athnere S1*, Chaplot PC1, Meena RH2, Choudhary J1, Kaushik MK1, Verma A1, Singh H3, Yadav P1 and Anchra S1
1Department of Agronomy, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
2Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology,
Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
3Department of Agrilcultural Economics and Management, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology,
Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
*Corresponding author: Athnere S, Department of Agronomy, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and
Technology, Udaipur-313101, Rajasthan, India; E-mail: athnere73@gmail.com
Copyright: © Athnere S, et al. 2022. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Information: Submission: 02/07/2022; Accepted: 30/07/2022; Published: 05/08/2022
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during 2020-21 and 2021-22 on clay loam soil having low in available nitrogen (278.36 to 279.42 kg ha-1), medium
in available phosphorus (18.73 to 20.39 kg ha-1) and high in available potassium status (328.40 to 332.72 kg ha-1) with slightly alkaline in reaction at the
Instructional Farm, Department of Agronomy, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, MPUAT, Udaipur during the rabi season 2020-21 and 2021-22 with the
objective to evaluate the response of malt barley to fertility levels and biofertilizers. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design (Factorial) with
15 treatment combinations comprised of three fertility levels i.e. application of 70 kg N+40 kg P2O5 +25 kg K2O ha-1, 60 kg N+30 kg P2O5 +20 kg K2O ha-1 and
50 kg N+25 kg P2O5 +15 kg K2O ha-1 with five liquid biofertilizers i.e. control, Azotobacter, PSB, KMB and Azotobacter + PSB + KMB. The experimental
results revealed that malt barley crop took maximum days to attain heading, 50 % anthesis and physiological maturity when crop was fertilized with highest
fertility levels i.e. 70 kg N+40 kg P2O5 +25 kg K2O ha-1 as compared to application of 60 kg N+30 kg P2O5 +20 kg K2O ha-1 and 50 kg N+25 kg P2O5 +15 kg
K2O ha-1. Among different liquid biofertilizers, Seed inoculation with Azotobacter + PSB + KMB recorded maximum days taken to heading, 50% anthesis and
physiological maturity over single inoculation of Azotobacter, PSB and KMB. The study showed the result that combined application of 70 kg N+40 kg P2O5
+25 kg K2O ha-1 + liquid biofertilizers Azotobacter + PSB + KMB extended the growth duration of crop and helps to increase productivity of malt barley crop.
Keywords
Fertility levels; biofertilizers; Heading; Anthesis; Malt barley
Introduction
Barley (Hordeumvulgare L.) is the world’s 4th most essential cereal
crop after wheat, rice and maize with a share of about 7% of the global
cereals production and 15% of coarse grains consumption. Barley is
grown throughout the temperate, tropical and subtropical regions of
the world and can be successfully grown in adverse climatic conditions
of drought, salinity and alkalinity due to its wider adaptability [1].
Barley is preferred cereal for malting because its glumes and hull
are firmly cemented to the kernel and remain attached to the grain
after threshing. The use of two-rowed barley for malting and brewing
industry has picked up recently with increased consumption of beer
and other malt-based products in many countries [2].
The malt utilization pattern has also changed in confectionaries,
8 % for whiskies and the balance (around 60-62 %) for brewing
[3,4]. One important factor influencing malting barley production is
the supply of N because of its effects on yield on the one hand and
grain protein content and malting quality, on the other. Excess soil
N may raise the protein content of the kernel, which is undesirable
for malting. Barley grains with high protein content are more difficult
to malt, yield low amounts of extracts and can cause difficulties in
brewing.
Adequate mineral fertilization is considered to be one of the most
important prerequisite in this respect. Nitrogen is the most important
nutrient for plant growth and development. It is an integral part
of chlorophyll, which is essential for photosynthesis. Phosphorus
nutrition plays key role in plant metabolism. Being involved in various
biochemical processes. Potassium plays an important role in the
maintenance of cellular organism by regulating cell membrane and
keeping the protoplasm in a proper degree of hydration. It activates
the enzyme in protein and carbohydrate metabolism and translocation
of carbohydrates and imparts resistance to plants against fungal and
bacterial diseases.
Biofertilizers play a very significant role in improving soil fertility
by fixing atmospheric nitrogen both in association with plant roots
and without it, solubilize insoluble soil phosphates and produces plant
growth substances in the soil and solubilize inorganic potassium from
insoluble compounds and make it available for plant uptake. They are
in fact being promoted to harvest the naturally available biological
system of nutrient mobilization.
Azotobacter are abiotic, free living soil microbes which play
an important role in the nitrogen cycle in nature and binding
atmospheric nitrogen which is inaccessible to plants. Phosphorus
solubilizing bacteria (PSB) plays an important role in converting
insoluble phosphate and applied phosphorus into available form
resulting in higher crop yields [1]. Potassium mobilizing biofertilizer
(KMB) is a biofertilizer based on selective strain of potassium
mobilizing beneficial bacteria of Frateuria spp. The micro Frateuria
spp is a beneficial bacterium capable of mobilizing available potash
near the roots of plants. Now it is indeed to promote the integrated use
of biofertilizer with chemical fertilizer to minimize the dependence
on inorganic fertilizer alone. Therefore keeping in view of above facts
the present study“Response of Malt Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.) to
Fertility levels and Biofertilizers” has been undertaken.
Material & Methods
The field experiment was conducted during rabi 2020-21 and
2021-22at the Instructional Farm, Department of Agronomy,
Rajasthan College of Agriculture, MPUAT, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
This region has typical sub-tropical climatic condition characterized
by mild winters and moderate summers associated with high relative
humidity during the months of June to September. The mean annual
rainfall of the region is 637 mm, most of which is contributed by South
West monsoon from June to September. The soil of experimental site
was clay loam in texture, slightly alkaline in reaction, low in available
nitrogen (278.36 to 279.42 kg ha-1), medium in available phosphorus
(18.73 to 20.39 kg ha-1) and high in available potassium status (328.40 to 332.72 kg ha-1). The experiment was laid out in randomized block
design (Factorial) with 15 treatment combinations comprised of three
fertility levels i.e. application of 70 kg N+40 kg P2O5 +25 kg K2O ha-
1, 60 kg N+30 kg P2O5 +20 kg K2O ha-1 and 50 kg N+25 kg P2O5 +15
kg K2O ha-1 with five liquid biofertilizers i.e. control, Azotobacter,
PSB, KMB and Azotobacter + PSB + KMB. The total quantities of
phosphorus and potassium with half dose of nitrogen were drilled in
furrows before sowing of seed. Remaining half dose of nitrogen was
top dressed at the time of first irrigation. The seeds were treated with
liquid biofertilizers using 5 ml kg-1 seed through standard procedure
2-3 hours before sowing as per treatment. Malt barley variety
“DWRB-137” was used as test crop. The seeds were sown in furrow
opened at the depth of about 4-5 cm using seed rate of 100 kg ha-1
keeping inter row spacing of 20 cm. The crop was irrigated at critical
growth stages viz., tillering (30 DAS) and flowering (80 DAS) as per
recommendation during both the year of experimentation to ensure
good crop growth. The crop was harvested from the individual plot
when plants were fully dried. First border plants were harvested and
removed from each plot. Then plants from net area were harvested
and bundled separately and tagged. The tagged bundles were kept
on the threshing floors for sun drying. In each plot observation was
recorded by counting the number of days taken for boot leaf stage,
50 % heading, 50% anthesis and physiological maturity which were
computed from date of sowing.
Results & Discussion
Days to boot leaf stage:
Fertility levels: A perusal of data reveals that increasing fertility
levels to malt barley crop failed to record significant influence on days
to boot leaf stage during both the years of experimentation as well as
in pooled analysis (Table 1).
Table 1: Effect of fertility levels and biofertilizers on days to boot leaf stage, heading stage, 50% anthesis and physiological maturitystage of malt barley.
Liquid biofertilizers: Irrespective of years as well as on pooled
basis, malt barley seed inoculated with liquid biofertilizersdid not
significantly influencedays taken to boot leaf stage.
Days to heading:
Fertility levels: Data) reveals that fertility levels had significant
effect on days to heading during both the year of study as well as in
pooled analysis (Table 1). Application of 70 kg N+40 kg P2O5 +25 kg
K2O ha-1took maximum days to heading which was significantly later
over application of 50 kg N+25 kg P2O5+15 kg K2O ha-1 but at par with
60 kg N+30 kg P2O5+20 kg K2O ha-1 during both years.
On pooled basis, application of 50 kg N+25 kg P2O5+15 kg K2O
ha-1 took 67.51 days to heading which was significantly earlier by 2.8
and 4.7 days over application of 60 kg N+30 kg P2O5+20 kg K2O ha-1
and 70 kg N+40 kg P2O5 +25 kg K2O ha-1, respectively.
Liquid biofertilizers: Data reflects that inoculation of malt barley
seed with liquid biofertilizers alone and in combination significantly
influenced days to heading during both the years of investigation as
well as in pooled analysis (Table 1). The crop took minimum days
to heading under control which was significantly earlier than seed
inoculation with Azotobacter alone and co inoculation of Azotobacter
+ PSB + KMB but at par with single inoculation of PSB and KMB
during both years. On pooled basis, compared to control, inoculation with Azotobacter, PSB, KMB alone and conjoint inoculation of
Azotobacter + PSB + KMB significantly enhanced days to heading by
5.25, 3.91, 3.33 and 7.25 days respectively.
Days to 50% anthesis:
Fertility levels: It is evident from data that fertility levels had
significant influence on days to 50% anthesis during both the years of
experimentation as well as in pooled analysis (Table 1). Application
of 70 kg N+40 kg P2O5 +25 kg K2O ha-1 took maximum days to 50 %
anthesis which was significantly later over application of 50 kg N+25
kg P2O5+15 kg K2O ha-1 but at par with 60 kg N+30 kg P2O5+20 kg
K2O ha-1 during both years.
Pooled results show that application of 50 kg N+25 kg P2O5+15
kg K2O ha-1 took 74.69 days to 50% anthesis which was significantly
earlier by 2.7 and 4.8 days over application of 60 kg N+30 kg P2O5+20
kg K2O ha-1 and 70 kg N+40 kg P2O5 +25 kg K2O ha-1, respectively.
Liquid biofertilizers: It can be inferred from the data that
inoculation of malt barley seed with liquid biofertilizers alone and
in combination significantly influenced days to 50% anthesis during
both the years of study as well as in pooled analysis (Table 1). The
crop took minimum days to 50% anthesis under control which was
significantly earlier than seed inoculation with Azotobacter alone and
co inoculation with Azotobacter + PSB + KMB but at par with single
inoculation of PSB and KMB during both years. On pooled basis,
inoculation with Azotobacter, PSB, KMB alone and co inoculation
of Azotobacter + PSB + KMB significantly enhanced days to 50%
anthesis by 5.54, 4.21, 3.62 and 7.54 days over control, respectively.
Days to physiological maturity:
Fertility levels: Fertility levels had significant influence on days to
physiological maturity during both the years of investigation as well as
in pooled analysis (Table 1). The malt barley crop fertilized with 70 kg
N+40 kg P2O5 +25 kg K2O ha-1 took maximum days to maturity which
was significantly later over application of 60 kg N+30 kg P2O5+20 kg
K2O ha-1 and 50 kg N+25 kg P2O5+15 kg K2O ha-1 during both years.
On the basis of pooled analysis, application of 70 kg N+40 kg P2O5
+25 kg K2O ha-1 took 120.67 days to physiological maturity which was
significantly later by 4.0 and 5.7 days over application of 60 kg N+30
kg P2O5+20 kg K2O ha-1 and 50 kg N+25 kg P2O5+15 kg K2O ha-1,
respectively.
Liquid biofertilizers: Inoculation of malt barley seed with liquid
biofertilizers alone and in combination significantly influenced days
to physiological maturityduring both the years of investigation as
well as in pooled analysis (Table 1). The crop took minimum days to
physiological maturity under control which was significantly earlier
than seed inoculation with Azotobacter alone and co-inoculation with
Azotobacter + PSB + KMB but at par with single inoculation of PSB
and KMB during both years. On pooled basis, single inoculation of
Azotobacter, PSB, KMB and co inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB +
KMB significantly enhanced days to physiological maturity by 5.67,
4.33, 3.75 and 7.67 days over control, respectively.
The phenological studies showed that the application of 70 kg
N+40 kg P2O5 +25 kg K2O ha-1 increased days taken to heading, 50%
anthesis and physiological maturity. The increased duration for each
of the phenological stages (heading, 50 % anthesis, and physiological
maturity) and overall crop growth period with increasing rate of
fertility levels seems to be due to their pivotal role in improving
nutrient status of the plant organs along with adequate supply of
metabolites. These might have facilitated optimum growth of each
plant parts and delayed their senescence. Nitrogen application
increased the vegetative growth as it increases the photosynthetic
activity and the leaves remain functional for a longer period which
improved plant height and dry matter accumulation which ultimately
delayed the ear heading in barley. The above findings are also in
cognizance with the findings [5-10].
Conclusion
The combined application of 70 kg N+40 kg P2O5 +25 kg K2O ha-1
along with seed inoculation with Azotobacter + PSB + KMB is proved
to be beneficial for extending the growth duration of crop and which
helps to increase the productivity of malt barley.