Research Article
Enhancing Occupational Health and Safety Standards in the Food Service Industry: A Case Study of Frangoz Restaurant, Sialkot
Simran Hameed*
Department of Environmental Sciences, Government College Women University Sialkot, Pakistan
*Corresponding author:Simran Hameed, Department of Environmental Sciences, Government College Women University Sialkot, Pakistan, Email: simranhameed4@gmail.com
Article Information:Submission: 26/10/2024; Accepted: 25/11/2024; Published: 30/11/2024
Copyright: © 2024 Simran Hameed. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Maintaining high standards of occupational health and safety in the food service industry is essential to protect employees and customers. This research assesses safety protocols at Frangoz, psychological stress factors for staff. Although basic safety measures like fire extinguishers are in place, gaps in hygiene, staff training, and the use of protective gear were noted. The study recommends enhancing safety with improved training, personal protective equipment (PPE) provision, and stricter hygiene practices. Data collected through questionnaires on personal hygiene and PPE revealed that only a minority of workers understand occupational health and safety, with 35% aware of personal hygiene standards and 45% skeptical of PPE effectiveness. This points to a need for comprehensive training to ensure PPE is used correctly, ultimately reducing workplace hazards.
Keywords:Food Hygiene; Food Safety; Public Health Risks; Public Health Hazards; OHS; PPE’s; Training
Abbreviations
OHS: Occupational Health and Safety; PPE’S: Personal Protective
Equipment’s; WHS: Work Health and Safety; OHSA: Occupational
Health and Safety Act; HSWA: Health and Safety at Work Act; WHO:
World Health Organization.
Introduction
Ensuring the safety and security of our food source is essential
for building a sustainable future. The food sector has emerged as a
pivotal and swiftly expanding industry on a global scale in recent
times. As workers become more informed about their rights within
the business, legal, and industrial realms, and as their awareness
grows regarding the serious and enduring health consequences linked
to producing specific industrial goods, there is a continuous effort to
reassess and enhance rules and guidelines to reduce avoidable hazards
for employees.
The food system needs to be mandated to ensure that nutritious,
safe food is accessible to everyone, a task it is presently not
accomplishing. Effective actions within the food system to enhance
nutrition and prevent foodborne illnesses necessitate coordinated
efforts that enhance the availability of nutrient-rich foods while
concurrently enhancing safety measures. The balancing act between
food safety and security poses significant hurdles; for instance, in
the development of circular food production systems that recycle
nutrients, there is a risk of pathogens accumulating within the cycle.
There are many acts which are made for the sake of protection
of workers from hazards which commonly prevail in any workplace.
These acts and laws are made for protection of workers. These laws
and acts include OHSA, Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004,
HSWA, Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 etc. There should be Work
Health and Safety (WHS) regulators to enforce a law for protection of
workers.
Laws under OHS Which Pakistan Follows:
There is no special independent law on occupational health safety
and health issues in Pakistan. Following are the laws which Pakistan
follows:
• Factories Act 1934
• Hazardous Occupational rules 1963
• Dock laborers law 1934
• Mines act 1923
• Workmen Compensation Act 1923
• Provincial Employees Social Security Ordinance 1965
• West Pakistan Shops and Establishment Ordinance 1969
• Boilers and Pressure Vessels Ordinance 2002
• Pakistan Environmental Protection Act 1997
• The Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971
• West Pakistan Labor Camps Rules 1960These laws say that it is right of every worker to have access to
cleanliness, proper ventilation and temperature, dust and fumes
protection, avoid overcrowding, proper lighting, safe drinking
water, latrines and urinals, spittoons, precautions against contagious
and infectious diseases, compulsory vaccination, welfare office,
precautions in case of fire, fencing of machinery, floors, stairs,
prohibition of women and children near heavy machinery and weight
lifting, protection of eyes, room for children, cranes and other lifting
machinery. (Azhar, S., & Choudhry, R. M. 2016).
I visited Frangoz restaurant located at Sialkot Cantt for OHS
assessment. The restaurant was ISO-14001: 2015 certified which aims
to constitute, review and maintain the environmental management
system. It provides14knowledge about new requirements for
leadership engagement, expanded legal compliance requirements,
need for risk-based planning and controls, new documentation
requirements, expanded operational control requirements, changes
in competence and awareness requirements, impacts on the internal
audit programs, increased certification costs.
There were many hazards which were prevailing there. These are
discussed below:
Hazards prevailing in Frangoz restaurant:
Biological hazards
• Burns
Burns can occur when workers are preparing or serving hot
foods or drinks, carrying hot plates or reaching over candles on tables
workers are often exposed to the risk of getting burned. The causes of
burns can be fire, boiling liquids, or grease burns can create extensive
scarring, trauma. Grease related burns can occur when adding frozen
foods to hot oil from splatters when adding or removing food or when
filtering or changing grease.The oil used there was more looks like grease. Its color was
black which was clearly showing that that oil was repeatedly used.
The condition of oil was showing that this oil was using from a long
period. Doctors have declared that oil that is repeatedly used is very
injurious to health which then causes many problems in body.
• Eye Injury:
During cooking or cleaning, worker’s eyes become vulnerable to
splashes of grease, sanitizing chemicals, and ingredients. Employees
should exercise caution when cleaning workspaces and they should
wear protective safety glasses when washing dishes or cleaning up
broken glass.• Cuts and Lacerations:
Knives and glassware are essential tools in most restaurants yet
they increase the risk of someone getting cut with a sharp blade or a
piece of broken glass. Knives, mandolins, and other cutting utensils
pose other threats for injury when used incorrectly or haphazardly.
To help avoid the risk of a cut or laceration knives should be kept
sharpened and in good condition. Workers should be regularly
reminded how to safely handle and store knives and other sharp
equipment.Unhygienic conditions:
• Uncovered food
It is observed that the food which is present in kitchen whether for
serving or in processing the food was uncovered. Flies from outside
are having contact with the food thus deteriorating food quality. This
leads to unhygienic food quality.• No use of gloves and caps
It was also observed that the chefs who are preparing food were
not using gloves. And some of them were not using caps also. This
increases the chances of contamination of food either from workers
grumpy hand or by mixing of things like hair with food.
Bad sanitary conditions:
Bad sanitary conditions were also observed there. The washrooms
were dirty. The worker’s hand is dirty and majority of workers were in
grumpy condition.Safety hazards:
• Slips, Trips, and Falls
Slips, trips, and falls are also observed as common hazards.
Walking on uneven floors or walking from tiled to carpeted areas
when entering the dining area from the kitchen can also cause busy
employees to stumble. Working in congested area while carrying
dishes around blind corners or going through a single door to and
from the kitchen can lead to injury.These common hazards can be avoided by immediately cleaning
any spills as well as by placing proper signage in areas with slick floors.
By making sure all floors remain clean and dry and passageways and
walkways are kept free of clutter and congestion Safeguard against
slippery floors by keeping floors clean and uncluttered and where
necessary treating floors with slip resistant coatings or chemical
treatments. Use floor cleaning chemicals with effective grease removal
and slip resistance properties. When spills occur clean them up
immediately and place caution or wet floor signs, until the floor is
dry. Wet floor signs alert people that the floor is wet so they can avoid
these areas or take extra caution when walking in these spots. Slip resistant
mats are ideal for kitchens.
Rubber mats not only offer better foot grip but provide a softer
and more comfortable walking surface that gives the feet, knees, and
other joints better protection from strains and other similar injuries
that mostly occurs on floor having tiles.
• Strains and sprains:
It was observed that waiters and waitresses are at high risk for
neck, back, and shoulder strains as a result of awkward postures while
serving and clearing tables. Strains and sprains can also be caused
by balancing or lifting too many plates or glasses at once, lifting
overfilled containers, and moving tables and chairs to accommodate
customers. If loads are not handled properly workers may suffer from
overexertion when the load that is lifted, carried, pushed, or pulled,
exceeds the limits of the human joint system doing the work.To help workers avoid strains and sprains manager should focus
on training workers as to the proper ways to carry and lift heavy items.
For example, carrying plates with your elbows close to your body can
help lessen the strain on the arms and back and when loading trays
attention should be paid to balancing the load evenly to help avoid
strains.
Un-trained workers:
It was also observed that the workers there have little or no
knowledge about hazards. A fire extinguisher was present there but
when workers are asked about that they do not have any know how
about that. They don’t even know for what purpose fire extinguisher
was used.Psychological hazards: It was observed that there is one lady
worker among ten male workers. They can easily harass that single
lady. This can lead to high level of stress in her which can further lead
to depression. In addition, the sitting area is designed in such a way
that there is no privacy. If there is a group of girls, the other customers
there can harass that group.
Ergonomic hazards: It was observed that the person who was
present at reception was continuously sitting their whole day. By
sitting the same awkward posture, the worker has got muscle and back
pain. Also, it was observed that a strange type of sound rang after
time to time. As the sound was very unusual and unbearable it causes
disturbance and stress among people there, especially the workers
who are continuously working there.
Aims and objectives:
To check the OHS status of the Frangoz restaurant.
• To encourage the management to prevent occupational illness
and injuries among workers. by providing them with personal
protective equipment’s and to ensure that workers use them.
• To identify the occupational factors and conditions hazardous
to health and safety at work.
• To encourage the management of the industry to take active
role in conducting trainings for worker’s knowledge regarding
PPE’s and their use. And to train their workers in such a way
that they could assist in implementation of occupational
health and safety policies at their industry.Literature Review:
Food safety in the food market is a crucial focal point in public
health due to its impact on individuals of various demographics
globally. Both local and international food industries play a major role
in influencing public health through food safety measures. With food
supply chains extending across borders, the globalization of health
risks is heightened. Hence, this literature review aims to pinpoint
prevalent public health risks associated with food safety concerns in
the food market.Facing a multitude of obstacles, global food safety and security
encounter significant hurdles amidst the expanding human
population. Looking ahead to the 21st century, the emphasis will
persist on enhancing worldwide food security through the provision
of safe and nourishing food. Within this realm, pivotal issues include
microbial contamination of produce, the impact of natural disasters,
and the spread of transboundary diseases. These persistent challenges
pose a threat to food safety and security, necessitating ongoing
dialogue and heightened awareness.
As incomes increase and living standards improve in developing
nations, the desire for meat, dairy products, and specialized crops
like fruits, nuts, and vegetables has grown (FAO, 2017) [1]. Similarly,
consumers in advanced nations have cultivated a liking for distinct
items promoted as organic, ethically sourced, or produced locally
(Feldmann and Hamm, 2015; O’Connor et al., 2017) [2,3]. The
rising need for food has already stretched resources, leading to soil
degradation, depletion of diverse ecosystems, and environmental
contamination globally, posing fresh hurdles in food security and ecofriendly
food cultivation (Tilman et al., 2011).
Moreover, the risk to food safety and security escalates
significantly due to disasters and cross-border diseases. Events like
fires and floods act as pathways through which pathogens, chemicals,
and pollutants, including heavy metals, can infiltrate the air, water,
and our surrounding environment where food is cultivated and
nurtured (Knorr et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2017; Andrade et al., 2018)
[4-6]. To address these issues effectively, it is essential to adopt a
comprehensive and organized strategy by forming interdisciplinary
groups comprising specialists from academia, corporate sectors, and
governmental bodies. The teams must collaborate to involve the public
in outreach and education efforts aimed at helping consumers grasp
the significance and intricacy of maintaining animal health, ensuring
food safety, enhancing food security, and promoting sustainable food
production.
Given the complexity and opacity of food chains, it is our
contention that adopting a One Health strategy is imperative for
evaluating trade-offs and achieving sustainability (Boqvist et al.,
2018)[7]. Furthermore, addressing the emerging issue of food fraud
necessitates attention. Achieving the appropriate balance among food
production’s security, safety, and sustainability entails navigating
various concerns and obstacles judiciously.
Food hygiene encompasses the standards and actions needed
to guarantee the safety of food from its creation to its consumption.
Upholding food safety is a critical aspect of every food production
process to ensure that the produced food is suitable for consumption.
Ensuring food safety is fundamental, yet there is a risk of it being
disregarded during the creation of efficient processes. Food safety
has been a persistent concern for human health throughout recorded
history, with many of today’s food safety issues being familiar. Despite
global efforts by governments to enhance food safety standards,
the prevalence of foodborne illnesses remains a substantial health
challenge in both advanced and emerging nations. A prevalent
health concern persists in developed and developing nations due to
foodborne diseases. Contamination of food can occur at various stages
such as slaughtering, harvesting, processing, storage, distribution,
transportation, and preparation. Adhering to proper food handling
practices is crucial in averting the majority of foodborne illnesses as
outlined in the “Five Keys to Safer Food” manual.
Improper handling of food significantly contributes to the
incidence of foodborne diseases. Food contamination and cross
contamination risks increase significantly, particularly within lower
socio-economic groups, as a result of inadequate environmental
conditions, substandard personal hygiene practices, low-quality
and limited water resources, as well as unhygienic food preparation,
storage, and serving methods. Food safety hazards are contaminants
that have the potential to render a food product unfit for consumption.
Inadequate adherence to food hygiene standards can result in the
occurrence of foodborne illnesses, potentially leading to fatalities
among consumers. Following safe food-hygiene practices at different
points of food acquisition, storage, preparation, and consumption can
greatly reduce the occurrence of gastrointestinal illness due to food
contamination (Mathee et al., 2004). The World Health Organization
(WHO) has been cognizant for a considerable time of the necessity
to instruct food handlers on their obligations regarding food safety.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has chosen the theme of
Food Safety for World Health Day 2015 to emphasize the critical link
between safe food and human health. The goal is to guarantee the
safety of food throughout the entire food supply chain, from farm to
table (Subba Rao GM et al., 2007).
In the twenty-first century, there exist abundant obstacles when
it comes to tackling issues related to food safety and security. This
analysis delves into the significance of adopting a One Health strategy
in ensuring food safety and security, as well as the various dangers that
these sectors encounter in this era. The discussed subjects include:
(1) One Health Initiatives aimed at Sustainable Food Systems,
Food Safety, and Food Security,
(2) A Concise Overview of Food Safety in the United States
(3) Rethinking Food Safety in the Twenty-First Century
(4) Addressing Food Security in the Modern Era.
Food safety is a crucial concern that impacts the entire global
population. Numerous nations worldwide are becoming more reliant
on the accessibility and safety of their food sources. Food safety is
increasingly valued worldwide, prompting the need for safe food
production to enhance public health benefits and environmental
advantages. Ensuring food safety involves protecting the food supply
chain from the introduction, proliferation, or survival of harmful
microbial and chemical substances (Uyttendaele, Franz, & Schlüter
2016; Radovanovic 2011) [8-9].
Consuming food that is unsafe due to the presence of harmful
bacteria, viruses, parasites, or chemical substances leads to over 200
diseases, spanning from diarrhea to cancers. Approximately 600
million individuals worldwide suffer from illnesses after consuming
contaminated food, with 420,000 fatalities annually and a consequent
loss of 33 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Children
below the age of 5 bear 40% of the burden of foodborne diseases,
leading to 125,000 fatalities annually. Diarrheal ailments represent the
most prevalent illnesses caused by ingesting tainted food, resulting
in 550 million individuals falling ill and 230,000 deaths each year.
Nowadays, the integrity of food safety faces challenges due to the
expansive reach of global food supply chains(Hawkes, C. 2006;
Athukorala, P. C., & Jayasuriya, S. 2003; Uyttendaele, M., Franz, E., &
Schlüter, O. 2016) [10,11,8]. Within the international market, there is a
risk of food fraud perpetrated by various entities including producers,
co-packers, distributors, and other participants in the national or
international trade network (Negri, S. 2009; Kruse, H. 2015; Spink, J.,
& Moyer, D. C. 2011) [12,13].
One of the primary concerns in public health is ensuring food
safety within the food market, given its universal impact on individuals
of all demographics worldwide. Both local and global food marketing
play a crucial role in influencing public health and food safety
outcomes. Food distribution networks currently extend across various
country boundaries, thereby amplifying the globalization of health
hazards (Aung, M. M., & Chang, Y. S. 2014; Wu, F. 2014; Bryden, W.
L. 2007; Van Schothorst, M. 2002; Mathews, K. H. Jr., Bernstein, J., &
Buzby, J. C. 2003) [14-18]. The purpose of this systematic literature
review was to identify prevalent public health risks associated with
food safety concerns in the food market. By offering evidence-based
insights, this review aims to enhance food safety within the market
through the implementation of risk-based strategies. Healthcare
professionals, scholars, and policymakers can leverage the outcomes
of this comprehensive literature review to safeguard the public against
adverse health consequences resulting from the consumption of
inadequately quality-controlled foods.
Multiple research investigations have confirmed the capability of
human norovirus to bind to and enter different types of fresh vegetable
crops (Hirneisen and Kniel, 2013; DiCaprio et al., 2015a,b; Markland
et al., 2017)[19-21]. These studies indicate various pathways through
which NoV can penetrate and move to different plant tissues, along
with the possible immune reactions of plants to these harmful agents.
The research indicates the various pathways through which NoV can
enter and move within different parts of the plant, as well as how
plants may react immunologically to these pathogens.
Insufficient compliance with food hygiene standards can result in
foodborne diseases and even fatalities among consumers. Foodborne
illnesses have been linked to inappropriate handling practices such as
incorrect storage or reheating (50%), improper food storage methods
(45%), and cross-contamination (39%). The surge in the number of
individuals dining out has led to a rise in foodborne illnesses due to
substandard food handling practices and a lack of awareness regarding
personal hygiene. The absence of awareness or implementation of
food hygiene contributes to these factors. HACCP, short for Hazard
Analysis and Critical Control Points, is a methodical preventive
strategy for ensuring food safety by addressing biological, chemical,
and physical hazards during production to mitigate the risks and
ensure the final product’s safety.
The fundamental connections between food safety and nutrition
primarily involve physiological aspects, extending beyond the
long-term and immediate impacts of either foodborne illnesses or
inadequate nutrition in isolation. Some mechanisms traditionally
categorized as either causes of foodborne diseases or malnutrition
can now be viewed as interdependent physiological reactions within
the human body. For example, contracting a foodborne illness can
heighten the vulnerability to malnourishment. Environmental
enteropathy, a multifaceted condition characterized by inflammation
of the intestines and damage to the epithelium, has been linked to
impaired growth (Budge et al., 2019; Harper et al., 2018). In contrast,
acute foodborne illnesses exhaust the body and can elevate nutrient
requirements during the healing process. Exposure to specific food related
dangers could hinder the metabolic functions essential for
efficient nutrient utilization or linked to developmental results as
indicated by Bahadoran et al. (2015)[22], Cano-Sancho et al. (2017)
[24], and Welch et al. (2019)[24].
Factors that pose a challenge to food security involve a lack of
access to healthy and safe food items or when there are constraints
on consumers’ ability to purchase food (Bazerghi et al., 2016).
Low-income populations are disproportionately impacted by
food insecurity, facing heightened vulnerabilities to hunger and
malnutrition.
Rapid urbanization has led to over half of the world’s population
residing in cities, posing a new obstacle to food security. The reliance
of urban dwellers on purchasing food makes the food security of lowincome
urban residents vulnerable to price hikes or unpredictable
fluctuations, especially in nations with inadequate socioeconomic
support systems.Therefore, addressing long-term food security has
become a key national objective, driving the exploration of new food
and animal feed sources as well as the establishment of robust food
supply chains. Various reports have tackled these issues.
Achieving freedom from hunger necessitates the harmonious
pursuit of both food safety and food security. An essential principle
dictates that unsafe food does not address issues of food security.
Nevertheless, efforts to guarantee the safety and quality of food
may, at times, lead to a reduction in the quantity of available food,
potentially exacerbating food shortages. Consumers commonly view
best before dates as a signal that food may no longer be safe to eat
post-expiration, resulting in more food wastage and jeopardizing
food security. Additionally, broad and indiscriminate food recalls
contribute to food waste due to safety concerns.
In order to promote human health, it is essential for diets
to comprise foods that are both healthy and secure. These foods
should facilitate individuals in fulfilling their nutrient needs without
surpassing them while also shielding them from foodborne illnesses.
Regrettably, this is not the reality for a significant portion of the global
population. Various forms of malnutrition impact one out of every
three individuals and are linked to economic burdens amounting to as
much as $3.5 trillion USD annually (Global Panel, 2016). Additionally,
factors related to diet contribute to around 22% of adult fatalities
(Afshin et al., 2019)[25]. The economic burden of these illnesses is
estimated to reach $110 billion USD annually (Jaffee et al., 2018)
[26-30].The anticipated global human population is set to reach 9.7
billion by 2050, posing escalating challenges in securing access to safe,
nourishing, and wholesome food. To meet the burgeoning demand,
food production must surpass 50% of the 2012 levels by 2050.
Materials And Methodology
Description of study area:
A casual survey was conducted in Frangoz restaurant which was
located at Pizza- 99 Aziz Shaheed Road, Sialkot Cantt, Punjab-51310.
Frangoz is a restaurant which is very famous in Sialkot city for
pizza, burger, fries, fried chicken etc. It is famous for its delicious and
tastier food. There are many workers in this place which are supposed
to do different kinds of works for example, some are supposed to cut
potatoes, some are supposed to do frying. Some is supposed to take
orders from customers. Hence, every worker is doing different kinds
of job there. They work about 10 hours daily in which shifting of
workers is done but even though they spend many hours working the
same work because it is demand of their jobs. Some workers also do
extra time for sake of having more salary. It’s totally up to their choice.Study design:
Study was conducted from the workers working at Frangoz
restaurant. The agenda was to examine the OHS hazards and to check
the workplace hazard and implementation of health and safety rules
at the restaurant workplace.Methods for data collection:
• Through personal observations and interviewing
A survey was conducted in Frangoz restaurant to observe the
OHS related hazards. There were many hazards which were prevailingthere including biological, physical, ergonomic and psychological
hazards that can impose severe dangers to worker’s working there. In
restaurant they were not following SOP’s which can make them to
susceptible. Few questions regarding how theses hazards affected their
business and why workers were not following SOP’s were asked from
the manager of the restaurant.
• Through questionnaires:
Questionnaires were got filled by the 50 workers which were
working according to their shift to check the desired parameters of
the study. The questionnaires were structured in such a way that they
consist of two sections. First section was about personal protective
equipment’s, them availability, training providence regarding their
use. The second and the last section was about personal hygiene as
it has a direct relation, so the questions were about how workers take
care of their hygiene and how much important they thought that
personal hygiene in order to keep them healthy.Results and Discussions
Knowledge about PPE’s:
Figure 4.1:Showing knowledge of workers about what are
personal protective equipment’s. Results have shown that out of 50
workers 30 workers have knowledge about PPE’s while 20 don’t have
knowledge about PPE’s.Providence of PPEs to workers:
Figure 4.2:Showing results about whether the industry provided
Figure 4.1:Showing knowledge of workers about what are personal
protective equipment’s. Results have shown that out of 50 workers 30
workers have knowledge about PPE’s while 20 don’t have knowledge about
PPE’s.
Figure 4.2:Showing knowledge of workers about what are personal
protective equipment’s. Results have shown that out of 50 workers 30
workers have knowledge about PPE’s while 20 don’t have knowledge about
PPE’s.
the workers with PPE’s or not. 45workers responded that industry
provide them PPE’s while other 5 responded that industry do not
provide them PPE’s.
Worker’s thinking about either PPE’s will save them from hazards or not:
Figure 4.3:Showing results when worker s asked about whether
PPE’s will save them from hazards or not.40 workers answered that
PPE’s will not help them to save from hazards while10 workers think
that PPE’s will save them.When provided, workers use PPE’s or not:
Figure 4.4:Showing results of question which was that if industry
provided you with PPE’s, you will use them or not. 15 workers
answered that they will use them while 35 workers answered they will
not use them.
Figure 4.3:Showing results when worker s asked about whether PPE’s will
save them from hazards or not.40 workers answered that PPE’s will not help
them to save from hazards while10 workers think that PPE’s will save them.
Figure 4.4: Showing results of question which was that if industry provided
you with PPE’s, you will use them or not. 15 workers answered that they will
use them while 35 workers answered they will not use them.
Figure 4.5:Showing results of question that did the industry provided the
workers with sanitizers and masks or not. In response to the question42
workers marked yes, while remaining 8 marked no.
Industry provides masks and sanitizers to workers no not:
Figure 4.5Showing results of question that did the industry
provided the workers with sanitizers and masks or not. In response
to the question42 workers marked yes, while remaining 8 marked no.Knowledge of workers about personal hygiene:
Figure 4.6:Showing the results of question which was about that
either the workers had knowledge about PPE’s or not. 10 workers
responded no while 40 responded that they had knowledge about
PPE’s.Worker’s access to clean and hygienic water:
Figure 4.7:Showing results of question that did the workers had
access to clean and hygienic drinking water.35workers responded
they had access to clean and hygienic drinking water while other 15
responded to no.No of times workers wash their hands
Figure 4.6:Showing the results of question which was about that either the
workers had knowledge about PPE’s or not. 10 workers responded no while
40 responded that they had knowledge about PPE’s.
Figure 4.7:Showing results of question that did the workers had access to
clean and hygienic drinking water.35workers responded they had access to
clean and hygienic drinking water while other 15 responded to no.
Figure 4.8:Showing results of question which was about how many times
did the workers wash their hands. 28 workers responded they wash more
than 5 times while 22 responded they wash less than5 times.
Figure 4.9:Showing results of questions that either the food did the workers
intake, hygienic or not.44 workers answered they intake clean and hygienic
food while6 responded not.
Worker’s food is hygienic or not:
Figure 4.9: Showing results of questions that either the food did
the workers intake, hygienic or not.44 workers answered they intake
clean and hygienic food while6 responded not.Conclusion
The basic aim of this research was to check the OHS status of the
Frangoz industry and to check the mitigation measures. The data was
collected by surveying and questionnaires which were about PPE’s,
personal hygiene. Many physical, biological, chemical, ergonomic
hazards were identified which were prevailing there. And the workers
were working there without any protection regarding these hazards.
PPEs had been provided to them but they didn’t use them as they find
it difficult to work with those PPE’s.To conclude the proper training
regarding importance of PPE’s and how to use them should be given
to workers so they will have the understanding hazards that prevail
in their industry and will use PPEs for the sake of protection against
these.
Recommendations
Each worker should be aware with health’s and safety issues
or problems and must be provided with personal protective
equipment’s.
• It was recommended that proper training and regular
workshops should be conducted about hazards that the
workers can face at their workplace, how they can protect
themselves from those hazards.
• They must here a health and safety officer to make their
industrial environment favorable for workers.
• They should be trained and provide knowledge about
which particular PPE will provide protection against which
particular hazard.
• Proper ventilation system provided sufficient fresh air to work
at confined space.
Proper designing of restaurant needed for the proper
arrangement.
• Don’t use heating instrument without using any barrier.
• Must using gloves and caps during working hours. Keep the
food covered.
• Alarms must be present in alarming situation. Fire
extinguisher must be display on proper place.
• Properly cleans the washing area.
• Exhaust fan must be display on working area.